Nikon D200 and 17-55mm f/2.8 AF-S for sale!
The time has finally come — I’m selling my trusty Nikon D200 and 17-55mm f/2.8 AF-S DX lens in order to upgrade…
I still love this combo, and it has served me well over the past few years. I’m only upgrading because the Nikon D700 exists, and it’s what I’m currently looking for in a camera. To say it plainly, if it wasn’t for the D700, I would honestly hold on to the D200 for at least another couple years.
If you’re just looking for price info, you can jump to the end of this post. If you’d like some background on the equipment, and the “why” behind my upgrade, please read on… There are a few reasons why an upgrade to the D700 is “right” for me at this point in time:
- The FX full-frame sensor is hot, and has amazing low-light (aka high ISO) performance.
- The D700 is a much cheaper, and IMHO better, version of the D3
- The AF system is top-notch (same as D3)
- It has some great advanced features, like Auto ADR (Adaptive D-Lighting), that will come in handy
Normally, I would just upgrade my camera body and keep my lens. This time around, though, the full-frame FX sensor of the D700 comes with one major drawback: it requires an FX lens to make full use of the sensor’s size. Thus, my 17-55mm f/2.8 AF-S DX just won’t cut it anymore. Honestly, I’m sad to let it go, but I can’t justify keeping a lens that won’t take full advantage of the new D700 body. Of course, the flip side is that I’ll get to enjoy a brand new 24-70mm f/2.8 lens instead, which I’ve been lusting over for a while.
Now to what you’re really looking for: price and condition.
I’m selling the D200 for $500, and the 17-55mm f/2.8 AF-S for $1000.
The camera includes the original box/documentation and the various accessories (body cap, cables, battery, charger, & LCD screen cover). The lens includes the original box/documentation, caps, the monster lens hood, and the soft lens case.
Both are in excellent condition, and have no visible or functional defects. I have kept the body and the lens in tip top shape since I bought them both new in 2006. Most of the photographs posted on this website made after April 2006 are shot with this combo, since I rarely take the 17-55mm off of the D200, so you can check out the outstanding image quality. And, yes, both of them are Nikon USA versions — no gray market for me.
A final note: I’m posting this info here, on my blog, to give you all a sneak peak. If I don’t get any bites in the next few weeks, I’ll probably post on Craigslist and call it a done deal.
Please let me know if you have any questions, or if there is any additional information that I can provide. Of course, feel free to pass along this post’s URL to anyone that you think might be interested.
Thanks much!
Everything
By Tag
- abstract
- aewed
- anniversary
- apple
- baby
- brussels
- bvi
- cabo
- cancer
- cars
- charity
- chicago
- concert
- cubs
- design
- diptych
- downtonabbey
- drink
- drone
- engagement
- europe
- f1
- family
- fashion
- film
- flythew
- food
- formulaone
- fredarmisen
- friends
- georgemichael
- germanfest
- germany
- gocubsgo
- gopro
- graffiti
- greece
- honeymoon
- humor
- iphone
- iraglass
- kalamazoo
- las vegas
- life
- link
- love
- mavic
- mayfest
- melanoma
- mexico
- michigan
- music
- nyc
- oktoberfest
- paris
- peoplewatching
- pets
- photography
- portrait
- sailing
- san diego
- sandiego
- session
- sneak
- stories
- stottsan
- stottson
- summer
- technology
- theo
- thisamericanlife
- travel
- travelogue
- tv
- updates
- urban
- vacation
- video
- vscocam
- vscofilm
- web
- wedding
- wham
- whatever
- worldseries
By Month
- October 2022
- June 2022
- October 2021
- July 2018
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- November 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- February 2016
- November 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- January 2011
- October 2010
- August 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
Comments